United States v. Rueda-Naranjo

89 F. App'x 63

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
• Decided: February 23, 2004
• Docket: No. 03-10343; D.C. No. CR-02-05452-REC
• Status: Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

**

Daniel Alberto Rueda-Naranjo appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 77-month sentence for being a deported alien found in the United States after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Rueda-Naranjo has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Rueda-Naranjo has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.