United States v. Rudy Diaz
This text of 546 F. App'x 281 (United States v. Rudy Diaz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Vacated and remanded by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appellant Rudy Geovanny Lemus Diaz pled guilty to unauthorized reentry of a deported alien after an aggravated felony conviction, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). The district court sentenced Diaz to twenty-four months’ imprisonment. Diaz timely appealed. The district court increased Diaz’s offense level under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A). This provision calls for a sixteen-level enhancement if the defendant was deported after he was convicted of a crime of violence. The district court found that Diaz’s prior Maryland second-degree assault conviction qualified as a crime of violence using the modified categorical approach. Diaz challenges this conclusion on appeal.
After the parties submitted their briefs in this case, we decided United States v. Royal, 731 F.3d 333 (4th Cir.2013), which *282 holds that Maryland’s second-degree assault statute is indivisible and, under Descamps v. United States, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 2276, 186 L.Ed.2d 438 (2013), not amenable to a modified categorical analysis in determining whether a conviction under that statute qualified as a “crime of violence.” Accordingly, we vacate and remand for reconsideration in light of Royal.
VACATED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
546 F. App'x 281, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rudy-diaz-ca4-2013.