United States v. Rudolph Owen Cheatham

48 F.3d 1217, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11065, 1995 WL 95856
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 9, 1995
Docket94-7125
StatusPublished

This text of 48 F.3d 1217 (United States v. Rudolph Owen Cheatham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Rudolph Owen Cheatham, 48 F.3d 1217, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11065, 1995 WL 95856 (4th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

48 F.3d 1217
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Rudolph Owen CHEATHAM, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 94-7125.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 16, 1995.
Decided March 9, 1995.

Rudolph Owen Cheatham, appellant pro se. Christine Whitcover Dean, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, NC, for appellee.

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Cheatham, Nos. CR-91-12-F; CA-94-702-5-F (E.D.N.C. Sept. 20, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 F.3d 1217, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11065, 1995 WL 95856, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rudolph-owen-cheatham-ca4-1995.