United States v. Rudolph Marquez Torres, Jose Luis Buenrostro, Richard Stevens Montes, and Ernesto Lopez Salsedo

622 F.2d 465, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 16222
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJune 27, 1980
Docket79-1760
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 622 F.2d 465 (United States v. Rudolph Marquez Torres, Jose Luis Buenrostro, Richard Stevens Montes, and Ernesto Lopez Salsedo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Rudolph Marquez Torres, Jose Luis Buenrostro, Richard Stevens Montes, and Ernesto Lopez Salsedo, 622 F.2d 465, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 16222 (9th Cir. 1980).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The order of the district court set forth in United States v. Salsedo, 477 F.Supp. 1235 (E.D.Cal.1979), is vacated and the proceedings are remanded to the district court for proceedings in accordance herewith.

After the filing of the district court opinion, the government delivered to the defendants the notes requested at the suppression hearing. The only items which the government has withheld are the surveillance logs.

At oral argument, the government stated: (1) it would deliver the surveillance logs to the district court for in camera inspection; and (2) in the event that the district court determined that the surveillance logs were relevant to the subject matter of the government agent’s testimony, the logs would be released to the defendants.

The district court shall exercise sound judicial discretion in determining whether portions of the surveillance logs should be excised before release to the defendants.

The order of suppression is vacated and the proceedings remanded to the district court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Phillips
732 F. Supp. 255 (D. Massachusetts, 1990)
United States v. Layton
564 F. Supp. 1391 (D. Oregon, 1983)
United States v. Torres
504 F. Supp. 864 (E.D. California, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
622 F.2d 465, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 16222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rudolph-marquez-torres-jose-luis-buenrostro-richard-ca9-1980.