United States v. Rudolph

Third Circuit

United States v. Rudolph

72 F.2d 1022, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 4811

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedAugust 16, 1934

DocketNo. 5133

StatusPublished

This text of 72 F.2d 1022 (United States v. Rudolph) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Rudolph, 72 F.2d 1022, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 4811 (3d Cir. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the United States from an order of the District Court suppressing the seizure of certain property and materials and directing the government to return the property in its custody to the elaimánts, Sydney J. Rudolph and Julius A. Rudolph, the appellees. The property involved was seized By the government and a libel proceeding, under section 25, title 2, of the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA § 39), was begun to forfeit the property, which the government contends was designed to violate the National Prohibition Act. The eases of United States v. Chambers, 291 U. S. 217, 54 S. Ct. 434, 78 L. Ed. 763, 89 A. L. R. 1510, and Massey v. United States, 291 U. S. 608, 54 S. Ct. 532, 78 L. Ed. 1019, control the decision in this case.

The order of the District Court is affirmed, with the direction that the libel he dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the United States from an order of the District Court suppressing the seizure of certain property and materials and directing the government to return the property in its custody to the elaimánts, Sydney J. Rudolph and Julius A. Rudolph, the appellees. The property involved was seized By the government and a libel proceeding, under section 25, title 2, of the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA § 39), was begun to forfeit the property, which the government contends was designed to violate the National Prohibition Act. The eases of United States v. Chambers, 291 U. S. 217, 54 S. Ct. 434, 78 L. Ed. 763, 89 A. L. R. 1510, and Massey v. United States, 291 U. S. 608, 54 S. Ct. 532, 78 L. Ed. 1019, control the decision in this case.

The order of the District Court is affirmed, with the direction that the libel he dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

72 F.2d 1022, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 4811, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rudolph-ca3-1934.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack