United States v. Rucker

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 17, 2009
Docket08-4751
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Rucker (United States v. Rucker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Rucker, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-4751

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

SHAWN DEWAYNE RUCKER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Thomas E. Johnston, District Judge. (5:03-cr-00097-1)

Submitted: July 10, 2009 Decided: August 17, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Matthew A. Victor, VICTOR VICTOR & HELGOE LLP, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. Charles T. Miller, United States Attorney, Miller Bushong, Assistant United States Attorney, Beckley, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Shawn Dewayne Rucker appeals the district court’s

order revoking his supervised release, rejecting his claim that

he was entitled to a two-level reduction in his offense level

based upon the amendments to the crack cocaine sentencing

guidelines, and imposing a twenty-one-month sentence upon

revocation of supervised release. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Rucker,

No. 5:03-cr-00097-1 (S.D.W. Va. July 15, 2008); see also United

States v. Forman, 553 F.3d 585, 588-89 (7th Cir.), cert. denied,

129 S. Ct. 1924 (2009). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Forman
553 F.3d 585 (Seventh Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Rucker, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rucker-ca4-2009.