United States v. Rubio

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided September 17, 2025·No. 24-50915·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 24-50915 Document: 64-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/17/2025

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED September 17, 2025 No. 24-50915 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce ____________ Clerk

United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Eduardo Rubio,

Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:23-CR-1429-1 ______________________________

Before Jones, Duncan, and Douglas, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Eduardo Rubio has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rubio has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 24-50915 Document: 64-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/17/2025

No. 24-50915

Rubio’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Rubio, (5th Cir. 2025).

United States v. Rubio (United States v. Rubio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)