United States v. Ruben Vargas-Ocampo

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Ruben Vargas-Ocampo. Read the opinion of the Court — 747 F.3d 299
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided September 26, 2013·No. 11-41363·Published

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT FILED _____________________ September 26, 2013

No. 11-41363 Lyle W. Cayce _____________________ Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

RUBEN VARGAS-OCAMPO, Defendant - Appellant

__________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, McAllen __________________________

(Opinion March 14, 2013, 5 Cir., 2013, 711 F.3d 508)

Before STEWART, Chief Judge, KING, JOLLY, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DENNIS, CLEMENT, PRADO, OWEN, ELROD, SOUTHWICK, HAYNES, GRAVES and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in favor, on the Court’s own motion, to rehear this case en banc, IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc without oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. Briefing instructions will be provided in the very near future.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ruben Vargas-Ocampo, (5th Cir. 2013).

United States v. Ruben Vargas-Ocampo (United States v. Ruben Vargas-Ocampo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Ruben Vargas-Ocampo
711 F.3d 508 (Fifth Circuit, 2013)