United States v. Ruben Valdez

451 F. App'x 679
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedOctober 4, 2011
Docket10-10362
StatusUnpublished

This text of 451 F. App'x 679 (United States v. Ruben Valdez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Ruben Valdez, 451 F. App'x 679 (9th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Ruben Valdez appeals from the 70-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Valdez contends that the district court erred by imposing a two-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 3C1.2 (Reckless *680 Endangerment During Flight). He further contends that the court’s findings in support of the enhancement were insufficient as a procedural matter. The district court’s determination to apply the enhancement was not clear error, see United States v. Reyes-Oseguera, 106 F.3d 1481, 1483-84 (9th Cir.1997), and its statements at sentencing were sufficient to permit meaningful appellate review, see United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 992-93, 995 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Carty
520 F.3d 984 (Ninth Circuit, 2008)
United States v. Reyes-Oseguera
106 F.3d 1481 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
451 F. App'x 679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ruben-valdez-ca9-2011.