United States v. Ruben Ruiz-Vazquez

620 F. App'x 339
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedOctober 22, 2015
Docket15-40139
StatusUnpublished

This text of 620 F. App'x 339 (United States v. Ruben Ruiz-Vazquez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Ruben Ruiz-Vazquez, 620 F. App'x 339 (5th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Ruben Judas Ruiz-Vazquez raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Betancourt, 586 F.3d 303, 308-09 (5th Cir.2009), which held that knowledge of drug type and quantity is not an element of a 21 U.S.C. § 841 offense. Nor is knowledge of drug type and quantity an element of an offense under either 21 U.S.C. § 952(a) or 21 U.S.C. § 960(a). See United States v. Valencia-Gonzales, 172 F.3d 344, 345-46 (5th Cir.1999); United States v. Restrepo-Granda, 575 F.2d 524, 527 (5th Cir.1978). The motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Valencia-Gonzales
172 F.3d 344 (Fifth Circuit, 1999)
United States v. Betancourt
586 F.3d 303 (Fifth Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
620 F. App'x 339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ruben-ruiz-vazquez-ca5-2015.