United States v. Ruben Cazares

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMay 30, 2024
Docket23-2863
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Ruben Cazares (United States v. Ruben Cazares) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Ruben Cazares, (8th Cir. 2024).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 23-2863 ___________________________

United States of America

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Ruben Cazares

Defendant - Appellant ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota ____________

Submitted: April 12, 2024 Filed: May 30, 2024 [Unpublished] ____________

Before BENTON, GRASZ, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

After Ruben Cazares pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute methamphetamine, the district court1 sentenced him to 10 years in prison. See 21

1 The Honorable Eric C. Tostrud, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846. He argues that he did not deserve a two-level “organizer, leader, manager, or supervisor” role enhancement. U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(c).

There was no error, procedural or otherwise, because the evidence established that Cazares supervised at least one other person. See United States v. Werkmeister, 62 F.4th 465, 468 (8th Cir. 2023) (reviewing for clear error). For one thing, he told a co-conspirator how much methamphetamine to give a buyer. See id. at 470 (noting that “direct[ing] the criminal activities of another conspirator on one occasion” is enough for the enhancement); see also United States v. Gamboa, 701 F.3d 265, 267 (8th Cir. 2012). For another, cellphone records showed that he was a “key link” between drug suppliers and local distributors. United States v. Reyes-Ramirez, 916 F.3d 1146, 1148 (8th Cir. 2019) (citation omitted). He played a supervisory or managerial role, in other words, so we affirm the judgment of the district court. ______________________________

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Diana Gamboa
701 F.3d 265 (Eighth Circuit, 2012)
United States v. Armando Reyes-Ramirez
916 F.3d 1146 (Eighth Circuit, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Ruben Cazares, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ruben-cazares-ca8-2024.