United States v. Roy Lee Hill

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Roy Lee Hill

540 F.2d 1254

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 24, 1976

Docket74-2087

StatusPublished

This text of 540 F.2d 1254 (United States v. Roy Lee Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Roy Lee Hill, 540 F.2d 1254 (4th Cir. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal presents the single question of the competency of trial counsel. We discern from the record no errors of judgment to support the allegation and affirm the judgment below.

During oral argument appellate counsel suggested to us matters outside the record that can best be developed, if true, in a proceeding below pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Our decision herein is without prejudice to the right of the appellant to seek collateral relief under § 2255.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal presents the single question of the competency of trial counsel. We discern from the record no errors of judgment to support the allegation and affirm the judgment below.

During oral argument appellate counsel suggested to us matters outside the record that can best be developed, if true, in a proceeding below pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Our decision herein is without prejudice to the right of the appellant to seek collateral relief under § 2255.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

540 F.2d 1254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-roy-lee-hill-ca4-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack