United States v. Roy Lee Hill
540 F.2d 1254
Opinion
This appeal presents the single question of the competency of trial counsel. We discern from the record no errors of judgment to support the allegation and affirm the judgment below.
During oral argument appellate counsel suggested to us matters outside the record that can best be developed, if true, in a proceeding below pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Our decision herein is without prejudice to the right of the appellant to seek collateral relief under § 2255.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Roy Lee Hill, 540 F.2d 1254 (4th Cir. 1976).
540 F.2d 1254 (United States v. Roy Lee Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Federal custody; remedies on motion attacking sentence
28 U.S.C. § 2255