United States v. Roy Dykes
This text of United States v. Roy Dykes (United States v. Roy Dykes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 22-7266 Doc: 8 Filed: 01/20/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-7266
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ROY LEE DYKES,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. James P. Jones, Senior District Judge. (2:18-cr-00003-JPJ-PMS-1)
Submitted: January 17, 2023 Decided: January 20, 2023
Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roy Lee Dykes, Appellant Pro Se. Martha Suzanne Kerney-Quillen, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-7266 Doc: 8 Filed: 01/20/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Roy Lee Dykes appeals the district court’s order denying his motions for a new trial
under Fed. R. Crim. P. 33 and to conduct related discovery. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the court’s order. United States v.
Dykes, No. 2:18-cr-00003-JPJ-PMS-1 (W.D. Va. Oct. 20, 2022). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Roy Dykes, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-roy-dykes-ca4-2023.