United States v. Roy

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Roy

613 F. App'x 218

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 24, 2015·No. No. 14-7406·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David Ray Roy appeals the district court’s order dismissing his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion, after construing it as a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pau-peris, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Roy, Nos. 3:06-cr-00340-HDH-9; 3:14-cv-00602-HEH (E.D. Va. Aug. 28, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David Ray Roy appeals the district court’s order dismissing his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion, after construing it as a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pau-peris, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Roy, Nos. 3:06-cr-00340-HDH-9; 3:14-cv-00602-HEH (E.D. Va. Aug. 28, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Roy, 613 F. App'x 218 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

613 F. App'x 218 (United States v. Roy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related