United States v. Rowland Zerba, Jr.

709 F. App'x 415
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 19, 2018
Docket17-2960
StatusUnpublished

This text of 709 F. App'x 415 (United States v. Rowland Zerba, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Rowland Zerba, Jr., 709 F. App'x 415 (8th Cir. 2018).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, Rowland Zerba challenges the district court 1 order revoking his supervised release and imposing a 7-month sentence, followed by 2 years of supervised release. His counsel has moved to withdraw, and has submitted a brief stating that Zerba believes the district court lacked authority to sentence him to additional supervised release because 18 U.S.C. § 3583(h), which specifically allows for supervised release following revocation and reinearceration, was not in effect at the time of his initial sentencing.

After careful review of the record, we conclude that the district court had authority to impose a term of supervised release following a revocation prison term. See Johnson v. United States, 529 U.S. 694, 713, 120 S.Ct. 1795, 146 L.Ed.2d 727 (2000); United States v. Palmer, 380 F.3d 395, 396-97 (8th Cir. 2004) (en banc) (standard of review). Accordingly, we grant counsel leave to withdraw, and affirm.

1

. The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. United States
529 U.S. 694 (Supreme Court, 2000)
United States v. Thomas Arthur Palmer
380 F.3d 395 (Eighth Circuit, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
709 F. App'x 415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rowland-zerba-jr-ca8-2018.