United States v. Rouss
This text of 113 F. 816 (United States v. Rouss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
(orally). The merchandise imported consists of cotton quilts having a fringe made of wool. They were assessed for duty under paragraph 366 of the act of 1897, as “manufactures made wholly or in part of wool.” The importer protested, insisting that the merchandise is covered by paragraph 322 of the same act as “manufactures of cotton, not specially provided for.” As these quilts are made in part of wool they fall within the decision of U. S. v. Altman, 46 C. C. A. 116, 107 Fed. 15.
The decision of the board of general appraisers is reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
113 F. 816, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4806, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rouss-circtsdny-1902.