United States v. Rountree

21 C.M.A. 62, 21 USCMA 62, 44 C.M.R. 116, 1971 CMA LEXIS 586, 1971 WL 12461
CourtUnited States Court of Military Appeals
DecidedAugust 20, 1971
DocketNo. 24,277
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 21 C.M.A. 62 (United States v. Rountree) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Rountree, 21 C.M.A. 62, 21 USCMA 62, 44 C.M.R. 116, 1971 CMA LEXIS 586, 1971 WL 12461 (cma 1971).

Opinions

Opinion of the Court

DARDEN, Chief Judge:

The general court-martial convening order in this case designated Colonel Seymour Abrams as the military judge. Appellant Rountree requested in writing that his trial be by military judge alone. An amendment to the original court-martial order substituted the name of Colonel Carl Abrams as the military judge, but the accused did not execute a new request in writing to be tried by Colonel Carl Abrams. Instead, Colonel Carl Abrams, after satisfying himself that Rountree understood the significance of a request for trial by a military judge alone, struck the name Seymour from the request in writing Rountree had executed and inserted his first name.

Under Article 16, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 816, before requesting trial by a military judge alone an accused must know the identity of the judge who is to function. When the military judge who functions is different from the one named in an accused’s request to be tried by military judge alone, the accused must execute a new request in order to meet the jurisdictional prerequisite of Article 16. United States v Dean, 20 USCMA 212, 43 CMR 52 (1970).

Despite Rountree’s indication after trial that he was satisfied with the trial that occurred we reverse the decision of the Court of Military Review and set aside the findings of guilty and the sentence. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Air Force. Another trial may be ordered.

Senior Judge FERGUSON concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Fairchild
13 M.J. 918 (U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review, 1982)
United States v. Miller
1 M.J. 844 (U S Air Force Court of Military Review, 1976)
United States v. Hussey
1 M.J. 804 (U S Air Force Court of Military Review, 1976)
United States v. Morris
23 C.M.A. 319 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1975)
United States v. Marell
23 C.M.A. 240 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1974)
Lewis v. United States
21 C.M.A. 667 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1972)
United States v. White
21 C.M.A. 583 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1972)
United States v. Brown
21 C.M.A. 516 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1972)
United States v. Grote
21 C.M.A. 519 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 C.M.A. 62, 21 USCMA 62, 44 C.M.R. 116, 1971 CMA LEXIS 586, 1971 WL 12461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rountree-cma-1971.