United States v. Ross

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Ross

620 F. App'x 199

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 22, 2015·No. No. 15-6846·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Robert Keith Ross appeals the district court’s order construing his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion as a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and dismissing it as such. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Ross, Nos. 1:07-cr-00117-MR-1; 1:09-cv-00365-MR (W.D.N.C. May 11, 2015). We deny Ross’s motion for a certificate of appealability. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Robert Keith Ross appeals the district court’s order construing his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion as a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and dismissing it as such. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Ross, Nos. 1:07-cr-00117-MR-1; 1:09-cv-00365-MR (W.D.N.C. May 11, 2015). We deny Ross’s motion for a certificate of appealability. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Ross, 620 F. App'x 199 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

620 F. App'x 199 (United States v. Ross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related