United States v. Ross

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7134

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

CHARLES THOMAS ROSS,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (2:06-cr-00056-RBS-FBS-1)

Submitted: October 19, 2010 Decided: October 28, 2010

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Thomas Ross, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Westley Haynie, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Charles Thomas Ross appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Ross, No. 2:06-cr-

00056-RBS-FBS-1 (E.D. Va. June 22, 2010); see United States v.

Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233 (4th Cir. 2010) (holding district court

lacked authority to grant defendant’s motion to reconsider

seeking further reduction of his sentence). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED