United States v. Rosetta Johnson, and Laura Lajean Johnson

73 F.3d 359, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40424, 1995 WL 761042
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 27, 1995
Docket95-2390
StatusPublished

This text of 73 F.3d 359 (United States v. Rosetta Johnson, and Laura Lajean Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Rosetta Johnson, and Laura Lajean Johnson, 73 F.3d 359, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40424, 1995 WL 761042 (4th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

73 F.3d 359
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Rosetta JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant,
and
Laura Lajean JOHNSON, Defendant.

No. 95-2390.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 14, 1995.
Decided Dec. 27, 1995.

Rosetta Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Gurney Wingate Grant, II, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting the Government's motion for ejection or in the alternative for unlawful detainer. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Johnson, No. CA95-379 (E.D. Va. June 9, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 F.3d 359, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40424, 1995 WL 761042, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rosetta-johnson-and-laura-lajean-j-ca4-1995.