United States v. Rosenthal
174 F. 652, 98 C.C.A. 406, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5245
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedNovember 2, 1909
DocketNo. 1,838
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases
This text of 174 F. 652 (United States v. Rosenthal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Rosenthal, 174 F. 652, 98 C.C.A. 406, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5245 (5th Cir. 1909).
Opinion
The judgment of the District Court is affirmed. See opinion of Judge Maxey in this cause, and Coffey v. United States, 116 U. S. 436, 6 Sup. Ct. 437, 29 L. Ed. 684; Stone v. United States, 167 U. S. 184, 17 Sup. Ct. 778, 42 L. Ed. 127.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. One (1) 1969 Buick Riviera Automobile Serial No. 69-49487 Euc 187877
493 F.2d 553 (Fifth Circuit, 1974)
United States v. One (1) 1969 Buick Riviera Automobile, Serial No. 69-49487 EUC 187877
358 F. Supp. 358 (S.D. Florida, 1973)
United States v. One Lot Emerald Cut Stones and One Ring
461 F.2d 1189 (Fifth Circuit, 1972)
United States v. Gramer
191 F.2d 741 (Ninth Circuit, 1951)
United States v. Manufacturing Apparatus, Oleomargarine, & Raw Materials of Western Oleomargarine Co.
240 F. 235 (D. Colorado, 1916)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
174 F. 652, 98 C.C.A. 406, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rosenthal-ca5-1909.