United States v. Rosenthal
174 F. 652, 98 C.C.A. 406, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5245
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 2, 1909·No. No. 1,838·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
The judgment of the District Court is affirmed. See opinion of Judge Maxey in this cause, and Coffey v. United States, 116 U. S. 436, 6 Sup. Ct. 437, 29 L. Ed. 684; Stone v. United States, 167 U. S. 184, 17 Sup. Ct. 778, 42 L. Ed. 127.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Rosenthal, 174 F. 652, 98 C.C.A. 406, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5245 (5th Cir. 1909).
174 F. 652 (United States v. Rosenthal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. One (1) 1969 Buick Riviera Automobile Serial No. 69-49487 Euc 187877
493 F.2d 553 (Fifth Circuit, 1974)
United States v. One (1) 1969 Buick Riviera Automobile, Serial No. 69-49487 EUC 187877
358 F. Supp. 358 (S.D. Florida, 1973)
United States v. One Lot Emerald Cut Stones and One Ring
461 F.2d 1189 (Fifth Circuit, 1972)
United States v. Gramer
191 F.2d 741 (Ninth Circuit, 1951)
United States v. Manufacturing Apparatus, Oleomargarine, & Raw Materials of Western Oleomargarine Co.
240 F. 235 (D. Colorado, 1916)