United States v. Rosemary Fierros
This text of United States v. Rosemary Fierros (United States v. Rosemary Fierros) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOV 24 2014
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 13-10290
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 1:11-cr-00274-LJO
v. MEMORANDUM* ROSEMARY FIERROS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Lawrence J. O’Neill, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 18, 2014**
Before: LEAVY, FISHER, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Rosemary Fierros appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges
the 48-month sentence imposed following her jury-trial conviction for conspiracy
to unlawfully produce and transfer identification documents, in violation of 18
U.S.C. § 371; 15 counts of unlawful production of an identification document and
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Rosemary Fierros, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rosemary-fierros-ca9-2014.