United States v. Roscoe Lee Farmer, in Re Lawrence Marquette, Esq

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Roscoe Lee Farmer, in Re Lawrence Marquette, Esq

476 F.2d 996, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 10540

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 13, 1973·No. 72-2696·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

It is the ORDER of this court that Attorney Lawrence Marquette is relieved as counsel in the above appeal.

For failure to prosecute the appeal with due diligence, Attorney Lawrence Marquette is assessed a penalty of $779.-40 in accordance with the provisions of Rule 46(c) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, this sum being the amount paid by the government for preparation of the reporter’s transcript on appeal.

The said sum shall be paid into the registry of the clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California within eight weeks from the filing of this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It is the ORDER of this court that Attorney Lawrence Marquette is relieved as counsel in the above appeal.

For failure to prosecute the appeal with due diligence, Attorney Lawrence Marquette is assessed a penalty of $779.-40 in accordance with the provisions of Rule 46(c) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, this sum being the amount paid by the government for preparation of the reporter’s transcript on appeal.

The said sum shall be paid into the registry of the clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California within eight weeks from the filing of this order.

United States v. Roscoe Lee Farmer, in Re Lawrence Marquette, Esq, 476 F.2d 996, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 10540 (9th Cir. 1973).

Pincite

476 F.2d 996 (United States v. Roscoe Lee Farmer, in Re Lawrence Marquette, Esq) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related