United States v. Roscoe Lee Farmer, in Re Lawrence Marquette, Esq

476 F.2d 996, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 10540
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedApril 13, 1973
Docket72-2696
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 476 F.2d 996 (United States v. Roscoe Lee Farmer, in Re Lawrence Marquette, Esq) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Roscoe Lee Farmer, in Re Lawrence Marquette, Esq, 476 F.2d 996, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 10540 (9th Cir. 1973).

Opinion

It is the ORDER of this court that Attorney Lawrence Marquette is relieved as counsel in the above appeal.

For failure to prosecute the appeal with due diligence, Attorney Lawrence Marquette is assessed a penalty of $779.-40 in accordance with the provisions of Rule 46(c) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, this sum being the amount paid by the government for preparation of the reporter’s transcript on appeal.

The said sum shall be paid into the registry of the clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California within eight weeks from the filing of this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Esser v. AH Robins Co., Inc.
537 F. Supp. 197 (D. Minnesota, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
476 F.2d 996, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 10540, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-roscoe-lee-farmer-in-re-lawrence-marquette-esq-ca9-1973.