United States v. Rosas-Pulido

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Rosas-Pulido. Read the opinion of the Court — 526 F.3d 829
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 20, 2007·No. 06-41268·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 20, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 06-41268 Clerk Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

OSCAR ADAHIR ROSAS-PULIDO,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:06-CR-585-1 --------------------

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Oscar

Adahir Rosas-Pulido (Rosas) has moved for leave to withdraw

and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967). Rosas has not filed a response. Our

independent review of the brief and the record discloses no

nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See

5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Rosas-Pulido, (5th Cir. 2007).

United States v. Rosas-Pulido (United States v. Rosas-Pulido) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)