United States v. Rosario Divins

388 F. App'x 417
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJuly 28, 2010
Docket09-50855
StatusUnpublished

This text of 388 F. App'x 417 (United States v. Rosario Divins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Rosario Divins, 388 F. App'x 417 (5th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Rosario Divins appeals her conviction and sentence for seven counts of criminal contempt and seven counts of mail fraud. Within ten days of the entry of judgment of conviction, Divins filed a motion for new trial based on newly discovered evidence in accordance with Fed.R.Crim.P. 33(b)(1). That motion has not yet been ruled upon, and therefore the judgment of conviction is not yet final for appeal purposes. See Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(3)(A)(ii), (b)(3)(B)(i); United States v. Healy, 376 U.S. 75, 78-79, 84 S.Ct. 553, 11 L.Ed.2d 527 (1964); United States v. Greenwood, 974 F.2d 1449, 1466 (5th Cir.1992). Accordingly, we remand this matter to the district court for a ruling on Divins’s motion for new trial.

LIMITED REMAND.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under dle limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Healy
376 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1964)
United States v. Greenwood
974 F.2d 1449 (Fifth Circuit, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
388 F. App'x 417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rosario-divins-ca5-2010.