United States v. Rosado-Curbelo
This text of 551 F. App'x 563 (United States v. Rosado-Curbelo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Carmelo Rosado-Curbelo appeals his 33-month (upward variance) sentence; and his 18-month sentence imposed following the revocation of the supervised release in two cases (although he raises no argument on appeal about his 18-month sentence). In context of the record, the district court’s explanation for his 33-month sentence, though brief, was adequate; and that sentence was procedurally reasonable. See United States v. Agbai, 497 F.3d 1226 (11th Cir.2007). The court’s 33-month sentence was also substantively reasonable in the light of the record and the relevant sentencing factors identified in 18 U.S.C. §§ 3553(a) and 3853(e), particularly given Rosado-Curbelo’s problems with recidivism and with adhering to the terms of his supervised release.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
551 F. App'x 563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rosado-curbelo-ca11-2014.