United States v. Rosa

879 F.2d 860, 1989 WL 75485
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Rosa. Read the opinion of the Court — 891 F.2d 1063
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided June 14, 1989·No. 88-3509·Published

Opinion

879 F.2d 860

U.S.
v.
Rosa (Joseph F.), Kostrick (William), Antonelli (Martin),
Campbell (Daniel), Connelly (Paul, Jr.), Dadamo (William),
Davis (Vivian), Diaz (Jorge), Gates (William), George
(Donna, Susan), Ily (Raymond), Jones (Gary), Linn (Larry),
Luketic (James), Marchitello (Victor), Naugle (Richard),
Nicklow (Mark), Noble (Robert), O'Connor (Timothy), Perrino
(Perry), Plisco (Ronald), Readel (Charles), Reshenberg
(Richard), Romano (Dino), Smith (William), Stefanik (Richard)

NO. 88-3509

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

JUN 14, 1989

Appeal From: W.D.Pa.,

Bloch, J.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Rosa, 879 F.2d 860, 1989 WL 75485 (3d Cir. 1989).

879 F.2d 860 (United States v. Rosa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.