United States v. Rosa Aurelia Gastelum-Martinez, Maribel Angelica Orozco-Chavira

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Rosa Aurelia Gastelum-Martinez, Maribel Angelica Orozco-Chavira

5 F.3d 541, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 30329, 1993 WL 343147

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 9, 1993·No. 92-10673·Published

Opinion

5 F.3d 541
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Rosa Aurelia GASTELUM-MARTINEZ, Maribel Angelica
Orozco-Chavira, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 92-10673.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 3, 1993.*
Decided Sept. 9, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, No. CR-92-00316-RMB; Richard M. Bilby, District Judge, Presiding.

D.Ariz.

AFFIRMED.

Before: REAVLEY**, PREGERSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The district court's judgment dismissing the indictment is affirmed for the reasons set forth in the district court order dated September 30, 1992.

AFFIRMED.

Judge FERNANDEZ dissents.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for submission on the record and briefs and without oral argument. Fed.R.App. p. 34(a); 9th Cir.Rule 34-4

**

Honorable Thomas M. Reavley, United States Circuit Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

5 F.3d 541
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Rosa Aurelia GASTELUM-MARTINEZ, Maribel Angelica
Orozco-Chavira, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 92-10673.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 3, 1993.*
Decided Sept. 9, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, No. CR-92-00316-RMB; Richard M. Bilby, District Judge, Presiding.

D.Ariz.

AFFIRMED.

Before: REAVLEY**, PREGERSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The district court's judgment dismissing the indictment is affirmed for the reasons set forth in the district court order dated September 30, 1992.

AFFIRMED.

Judge FERNANDEZ dissents.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for submission on the record and briefs and without oral argument. Fed.R.App. p. 34(a); 9th Cir.Rule 34-4

**

Honorable Thomas M. Reavley, United States Circuit Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, sitting by designation

United States v. Rosa Aurelia Gastelum-Martinez, Maribel Angelica Orozco-Chavira, 5 F.3d 541, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 30329, 1993 WL 343147 (9th Cir. 1993).

Pincite

5 F.3d 541 (United States v. Rosa Aurelia Gastelum-Martinez, Maribel Angelica Orozco-Chavira) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.