Home/Fourth Circuit/United States v. Roosevelt Chaney, Mike Mitchell Quinn, Roy Mitchell Quinn, John Elton Whitlow, and Carl Edward Wright

United States v. Roosevelt Chaney, Mike Mitchell Quinn, Roy Mitchell Quinn, John Elton Whitlow, and Carl Edward Wright

316 F.2d 188, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5715
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 29, 1963
Docket8864
StatusPublished

This text of 316 F.2d 188 (United States v. Roosevelt Chaney, Mike Mitchell Quinn, Roy Mitchell Quinn, John Elton Whitlow, and Carl Edward Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Roosevelt Chaney, Mike Mitchell Quinn, Roy Mitchell Quinn, John Elton Whitlow, and Carl Edward Wright, 316 F.2d 188, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5715 (4th Cir. 1963).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a prosecution for violation of the liquor laws. An examination of the record satisfies us that the evidence furnished a sufficient basis for the jury’s finding of guilt as to each of the defendants. Objections to the evidence are without merit, and we find no error affecting substantial rights.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
316 F.2d 188, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5715, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-roosevelt-chaney-mike-mitchell-quinn-roy-mitchell-quinn-ca4-1963.