United States v. Roosevelt Chaney, Mike Mitchell Quinn, Roy Mitchell Quinn, John Elton Whitlow, and Carl Edward Wright
316 F.2d 188, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5715
Opinion
This is a prosecution for violation of the liquor laws. An examination of the record satisfies us that the evidence furnished a sufficient basis for the jury’s finding of guilt as to each of the defendants. Objections to the evidence are without merit, and we find no error affecting substantial rights.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Roosevelt Chaney, Mike Mitchell Quinn, Roy Mitchell Quinn, John Elton Whitlow, and Carl Edward Wright, 316 F.2d 188, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5715 (4th Cir. 1963).
316 F.2d 188 (United States v. Roosevelt Chaney, Mike Mitchell Quinn, Roy Mitchell Quinn, John Elton Whitlow, and Carl Edward Wright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.