United States v. Rook

16 C.M.A. 148, 16 USCMA 148, 36 C.M.R. 304, 1966 CMA LEXIS 292, 1966 WL 4465
United States Court of Military Appeals·Decided March 18, 1966·No. No. 19,186·Published

Opinion

Opinion of the Court

PER Curiam:

The issue presented by the accused’s petition for grant of review is the same as that considered in United States v Metz, 16 USCMA 140, 36 CMR 296. For the reasons recited in our opinion in that case, the decision of the board of review is reversed and the action of the convening authority is set aside. The record of trial is returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Army for submission to another competent reviewing authority for further proceedings under Articles 61 and 64, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 861 and 864, respectively.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Rook, 16 C.M.A. 148, 16 USCMA 148, 36 C.M.R. 304, 1966 CMA LEXIS 292, 1966 WL 4465 (cma 1966).

16 C.M.A. 148 (United States v. Rook) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Metz
16 C.M.A. 140 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1966)