United States v. Rondell Scott Hedrick

670 F. App'x 694
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided November 21, 2016·No. 15-14083·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Stephen J. Langs, appointed counsel for Rondell Scott Hedrick in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 3 86 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of. the relative merit of Hedrick’s appeal is correct. Because inde *695 pendent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Hedrick’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Rondell Scott Hedrick, 670 F. App'x 694 (11th Cir. 2016).

670 F. App'x 694 (United States v. Rondell Scott Hedrick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)