United States v. Ronald Ray Pollard

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided February 5, 1998·No. 97-3722·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-3722

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri.

Ronald Ray Pollard, * * [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

Submitted: February 2, 1998 Filed: February 5, 1998

Before FAGG, BEAM, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Ronald Ray Pollard challenges his conviction and 192-month sentence imposed by the district court1 after he pleaded guilty to one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(e)(1). Pollard cites United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549 (1995), and argues Congress lacked authority under the Commerce Clause to enact section 922(g), which prohibits the possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. We conclude Pollard&s Lopez challenge to section 922(g) is foreclosed by this court&s prior decisions. See United States v. Bates, 77 F.3d 1101,

1 The Honorable Donald J. Stohr, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

1103-04 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 215 (1996); United States v. Shelton, 66 F.3d 991, 992 (8th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 116 S. Ct. 1364 (1996). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ronald Ray Pollard, (8th Cir. 1998).

United States v. Ronald Ray Pollard (United States v. Ronald Ray Pollard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Lopez
514 U.S. 549 (Supreme Court, 1995)
United States v. Aaron Shelton
66 F.3d 991 (Eighth Circuit, 1995)
United States v. Phillip Wilson Bates
77 F.3d 1101 (Eighth Circuit, 1996)