United States v. Ronald Preston Hull, United States of America v. Marvin Ray Munds
This text of 441 F.2d 1165 (United States v. Ronald Preston Hull, United States of America v. Marvin Ray Munds) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
441 F.2d 1165
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Ronald Preston HULL, Appellant.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Marvin Ray MUNDS, Appellant.
Nos. 26519, 26520.
Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
May 10, 1971, Rehearing Denied July 1, 1971.
George W. Hunt (appeared), of Humphreys & Hunt, San Diego, Cal., for appellant Hull.
Wesley C. Blake (argued), San Diego, Cal., for appellant Munds.
Brian E. Michaels (argued), Asst. U.S. Atty., Harry Steward, U.S. Atty., Robert H. Filsinger, Chief, Crim. Div., San Diego, Cal., for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS and TRASK, Circuit Judges; and REAL,1 District judge.
PER CURIAM:
The judgments of conviction are affirmed. We find no error.
United States v. Markham, 9 Cir., 440 F.2d 1119, decided April 12, 1971, answers the principal contention made here.
The mandate will issue now.
The Honorable Manuel L. Real, United States District Judge, Central District of California, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
441 F.2d 1165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ronald-preston-hull-united-states-of-america-v-marvin-ca9-1971.