United States v. Ronald Preston Hull, United States of America v. Marvin Ray Munds

441 F.2d 1165
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 1, 1971·No. 26520·Published

Opinion

441 F.2d 1165

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Ronald Preston HULL, Appellant.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Marvin Ray MUNDS, Appellant.

Nos. 26519, 26520.

Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

May 10, 1971, Rehearing Denied July 1, 1971.

George W. Hunt (appeared), of Humphreys & Hunt, San Diego, Cal., for appellant Hull.

Wesley C. Blake (argued), San Diego, Cal., for appellant Munds.

Brian E. Michaels (argued), Asst. U.S. Atty., Harry Steward, U.S. Atty., Robert H. Filsinger, Chief, Crim. Div., San Diego, Cal., for appellee.

Before CHAMBERS and TRASK, Circuit Judges; and REAL,1 District judge.

PER CURIAM:

The judgments of conviction are affirmed. We find no error.

United States v. Markham, 9 Cir., 440 F.2d 1119, decided April 12, 1971, answers the principal contention made here.

The mandate will issue now.

1

The Honorable Manuel L. Real, United States District Judge, Central District of California, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ronald Preston Hull, United States of America v. Marvin Ray Munds, 441 F.2d 1165 (9th Cir. 1971).

441 F.2d 1165 (United States v. Ronald Preston Hull, United States of America v. Marvin Ray Munds) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Michael Walter Markham
440 F.2d 1119 (Ninth Circuit, 1971)