United States v. Ronald Preston Hull, United States of America v. Marvin Ray Munds

441 F.2d 1165
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJuly 1, 1971
Docket26520
StatusPublished

This text of 441 F.2d 1165 (United States v. Ronald Preston Hull, United States of America v. Marvin Ray Munds) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Ronald Preston Hull, United States of America v. Marvin Ray Munds, 441 F.2d 1165 (9th Cir. 1971).

Opinion

441 F.2d 1165

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Ronald Preston HULL, Appellant.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Marvin Ray MUNDS, Appellant.

Nos. 26519, 26520.

Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

May 10, 1971, Rehearing Denied July 1, 1971.

George W. Hunt (appeared), of Humphreys & Hunt, San Diego, Cal., for appellant Hull.

Wesley C. Blake (argued), San Diego, Cal., for appellant Munds.

Brian E. Michaels (argued), Asst. U.S. Atty., Harry Steward, U.S. Atty., Robert H. Filsinger, Chief, Crim. Div., San Diego, Cal., for appellee.

Before CHAMBERS and TRASK, Circuit Judges; and REAL,1 District judge.

PER CURIAM:

The judgments of conviction are affirmed. We find no error.

United States v. Markham, 9 Cir., 440 F.2d 1119, decided April 12, 1971, answers the principal contention made here.

The mandate will issue now.

1

The Honorable Manuel L. Real, United States District Judge, Central District of California, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Michael Walter Markham
440 F.2d 1119 (Ninth Circuit, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
441 F.2d 1165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ronald-preston-hull-united-states-of-america-v-marvin-ca9-1971.