United States v. Ronald Paul Bolden
This text of 437 F.2d 1357 (United States v. Ronald Paul Bolden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
437 F.2d 1357
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Ronald Paul BOLDEN, Appellant.
No. 25638.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
March 4, 1971.
Marcus O. Tucker, Santa Monica, Cal., for appellant.
Robert L. Meyer, U.S. Atty., David R. Nissen, Chief, Crim. Div., Darrell W. MacIntyre, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS, MERRILL and TRASK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
There seems to be no indication in the record that Bolden ever exhausted his administrative remedies.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
437 F.2d 1357, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11549, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ronald-paul-bolden-ca9-1971.