United States v. Ronald Elliott Lunder

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Ronald Elliott Lunder

439 F.2d 154, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10903

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedApril 7, 1971

Docket26583

StatusPublished

This text of 439 F.2d 154 (United States v. Ronald Elliott Lunder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Ronald Elliott Lunder, 439 F.2d 154, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10903 (9th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

439 F.2d 154

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Ronald Elliott LUNDER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 26583.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

April 7, 1971.

Stanley J. Friedman, of Herzstein, Maier, Friedman, & Lippett, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

James L. Browning, Jr., U.S. Atty., James L. Hazard, Asst. U.S. Atty., F. Steele Langford, Chief, Criminal Division, San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before DUNIWAY, ELY, and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The judgment must be reversed. United States v. French, 9 Cir., 1970, 429 F.2d 391, and United States v. Newton, 9 Cir., 1970, 435 F.2d 671 are controlling. The government agrees.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI