United States v. Ronald Davenport
This text of 479 F. App'x 758 (United States v. Ronald Davenport) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Ronald James Davenport appeals pro se from the district court’s default judgment in the United States’ action to reduce to judgment unpaid federal income tax assessments. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion. Stars’ Desert Inn Hotel & Country Club, Inc. v. Hwang, 105 F.3d 521, 524 (9th Cir.1997). We affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion by entering a default judgment against Davenport as a sanction after Davenport repeatedly refused to submit to any discovery despite being compelled by the court to do so and warned that failure to comply could lead to an entry of default judgment. See id. (discussing factors for district court to consider before entering default judgment as a sanction); see also Fed.R.Civ.P. 37(b)(2)(A)(vi) (permitting default judgment as a sanction for failing to comply with a discovery order).
Davenport’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.
Davenport’s motion entitled “Complaint on Claim for Common Law Immunity Joined with a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus” filed on July 12, 2010, is denied.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
479 F. App'x 758, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ronald-davenport-ca9-2012.