United States v. ROMERO
Opinion
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
Before
DALY, GROSS, and de GROOT Appellate Military Judges
UNITED STATES
Appellee
v.
Nicholas J. ROMERO
Corporal (E-4), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant
No. 202500309
Decided: 31 March 2026
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judge: Adam G. Partridge
Sentence adjudged 14 May 2025 by a special court-martial tried at Marine Corps Support Facility, New Orleans, Louisiana, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E-1, confinement for 30 days, and a bad-conduct discharge. 1
For Appellant:
Lieutenant Colonel Gregory P. Adams, USMCR
1 Appellant was credited with having served 30 days of pretrial confinement.
United States v. Romero, NMCCA No. 202500309 Opinion of the Court
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
PER CURIAM:
After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred . 2 The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
MARK K. JAMISON
Clerk of Court
2 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. ROMERO (United States v. ROMERO) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.