United States v. ROMERO
Opinion
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
Before
GROSS, de GROOT and SLABBEKORN Appellate Military Judges
UNITED STATES
Appellee
v.
Dionte K. ROMERO
Corporal (E-4), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant
No. 202400353
Decided: 29 May 2025
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judge: Ryan C. Lipton
Sentence adjudged 12 June 2024 by a special court-martial tried at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E- 1, confinement for eight months, and a bad-conduct discharge.
For Appellant:
Captain Katherine Malcolm, USMC
United States v. Romero, NMCCA No. 202400353 Opinion of the Court
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
PER CURIAM:
After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. 1 The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
MARK K. JAMISON Clerk of Court
1 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. ROMERO (United States v. ROMERO) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.