United States v. Romero

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided February 17, 2017·No. Criminal No. 2013-0066·Published

Opinion

CONSENT FOR MOD|F|CAT|ON OF SUPERV|SED RELEASE/PROBAT|ON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT CoURT

for the District of Columbia

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) 13-066 VS- ) Criminal No. |V|ERCEDES RON|ERO § F I L E D Def`endant ) FEB 1 7 2017

C|erk, U.S. Dlstr|ct & Bankruptcy Courts fo_r the Dlstrict of Co|umbla

CONSENT TO MODIFY PROBATION/SUPERVISED RELEASE

The parties agree the defendant's conditions of supervised release/probation should be modified and being no objection thereto, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT the defendant's conditions of supervised release/probation are modified as follows: (state modification, e.g. that he spend 60 days of his term in an inpatient treatment facility).

to require restitution payments at the rate of not less than $l0.00/month .

t?im ~/G to mt

Failure to file timely objections to the findings and recommendations set f`orth in this report may waive your right of appeal from an order of the District Court adopting such findings and recommendations. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985).

The magistratejudge having recommended that the conditions of` the defendant's supervised release/probation be modified and there being no objection thereto, IT IS ORDERED that the

recommendation of the magistrate judge is accepted.

Dated: /:.. BWJ /4( )~m'? Fl’q"\{)’éw\/

U.S/District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Romero, (D.D.C. 2017).

United States v. Romero (United States v. Romero) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas v. Arn
474 U.S. 140 (Supreme Court, 1986)