United States v. Romero
This text of United States v. Romero (United States v. Romero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT July 1, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-41674 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ANGEL ROMERO,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:04-CR-349-1 --------------------
Before REAVLEY, JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed to represent Angel Romero on appeal has
filed a motion to withdraw and a brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Romero filed no response.
Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no
nonfrivolous issue in this direct appeal. Accordingly, the
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Romero, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-romero-ca5-2005.