United States v. Romberg

Second Circuit

United States v. Romberg

150 F.2d 116, 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 2741

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedJune 19, 1945

DocketNo. 359

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 150 F.2d 116 (United States v. Romberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Romberg, 150 F.2d 116, 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 2741 (2d Cir. 1945).

Pincite

Opinion

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

In the light of United States v. Achtner, 2 Cir., 144 F.2d 49, 52, the sole question here is whether the Union’s executive board had “some * * * adequate reason for ascertaining * * * defendant’s citizenship” at “a time of deepening national crisis.” We think it did. In so holding, we have considered the nature of defendant’s job, the fact that he had received his employment through the Union, and that the Union’s board was inquiring into a charge that defendant had done defective work.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

In the light of United States v. Achtner, 2 Cir., 144 F.2d 49, 52, the sole question here is whether the Union’s executive board had “some * * * adequate reason for ascertaining * * * defendant’s citizenship” at “a time of deepening national crisis.” We think it did. In so holding, we have considered the nature of defendant’s job, the fact that he had received his employment through the Union, and that the Union’s board was inquiring into a charge that defendant had done defective work.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

150 F.2d 116, 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 2741, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-romberg-ca2-1945.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack