United States v. Romberg

Second Circuit

United States v. Romberg

150 F.2d 116, 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 2741

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided June 19, 1945·No. No. 359·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

In the light of United States v. Achtner, 2 Cir., 144 F.2d 49, 52, the sole question here is whether the Union’s executive board had “some * * * adequate reason for ascertaining * * * defendant’s citizenship” at “a time of deepening national crisis.” We think it did. In so holding, we have considered the nature of defendant’s job, the fact that he had received his employment through the Union, and that the Union’s board was inquiring into a charge that defendant had done defective work.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

In the light of United States v. Achtner, 2 Cir., 144 F.2d 49, 52, the sole question here is whether the Union’s executive board had “some * * * adequate reason for ascertaining * * * defendant’s citizenship” at “a time of deepening national crisis.” We think it did. In so holding, we have considered the nature of defendant’s job, the fact that he had received his employment through the Union, and that the Union’s board was inquiring into a charge that defendant had done defective work.

Affirmed.

United States v. Romberg, 150 F.2d 116, 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 2741 (2d Cir. 1945).

Pincite

150 F.2d 116 (United States v. Romberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related