United States v. Romano

9 C.M.A. 557, 9 USCMA 557, 26 C.M.R. 337, 1958 CMA LEXIS 461, 1958 WL 3372
CourtUnited States Court of Military Appeals
DecidedSeptember 12, 1958
DocketNo. 11,515
StatusPublished

This text of 9 C.M.A. 557 (United States v. Romano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Romano, 9 C.M.A. 557, 9 USCMA 557, 26 C.M.R. 337, 1958 CMA LEXIS 461, 1958 WL 3372 (cma 1958).

Opinion

Opinion of the Court

ROBERT E. Quinn, Chief Judge:

The instructional question in this case is the same as that in United States v Hairston, 9 USCMA 554, 26 CMR 334. For the reasons set out in the principal opinion in that case, the decision of the board of review here is affirmed.

Judge LatimeR concurs. Judge FERGUSON dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Hairston
9 C.M.A. 554 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 C.M.A. 557, 9 USCMA 557, 26 C.M.R. 337, 1958 CMA LEXIS 461, 1958 WL 3372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-romano-cma-1958.