United States v. Romano

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 10, 2010·No. 09-4259·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-4259

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ARLO WHITEOAK ROMANO, a/k/a Lo,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (1:08-cr-00059-IMK-JSK-1)

Submitted: April 15, 2010 Decided: May 10, 2010

Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lance E. Rollo, Morgantown, West Virginia, for Appellant. Betsy C. Jividen, Acting United States Attorney, Andrew R. Cogar, Assistant United States Attorney, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Arlo Whiteoak Romano appeals the district court’s

decision to assess a two-level sentencing enhancement pursuant

to U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 3B1.1(c) (2009), based

on Romano’s status as an organizer, leader, manager, or

supervisor of a drug conspiracy. We have reviewed the record

and conclude that the evidence of Romano’s role in the

conspiracy, including supplying drugs to street level dealers,

recruiting at least one person into the conspiracy, and managing

a substantial amount of drugs and money, supported application

of the enhancement. USSG § 3B1.1(c) & comment. (nn. 2, 4).

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Romano, (4th Cir. 2010).

United States v. Romano (United States v. Romano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.