United States v. Rolando Rodriguez

394 F. App'x 58
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedAugust 30, 2010
Docket09-41251
StatusUnpublished

This text of 394 F. App'x 58 (United States v. Rolando Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Rolando Rodriguez, 394 F. App'x 58 (5th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Defendant-Appellant Rolando Rodriguez pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute more than 100 kilograms of marijuana and was sentenced to 136 months of imprisonment, five years of supervised release, and $7,197.04 in restitution.

Rodriguez argues that the district court erred in enhancing his sentence by six levels pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3A1.2(c)(l) because the evidence in the record does not establish an intentional aggravated assault on police, but rather demonstrates at best a negligent loss of control of his vehicle. However, Rodriguez’s conduct, which involved threatening moves toward police, amounted to more than mere recklessness, and thus the district court’s application of the § 3A1.2(c)(l) enhancement was plausible in light of the record as a whole. See United States v. Anderson, 559 F.3d 348, 356-57 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 2814, 174 L.Ed.2d 308 (2009); United States v. Caldwell, 448 F.3d 287, 290 (5th Cir.2006); United States v. Gillyard, 261 F.3d 506, 510 (5th Cir.2001). Accordingly, Rodriguez has not shown that the district court committed clear error. See Caldwell, 448 F.3d at 290.

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Gillyard
261 F.3d 506 (Fifth Circuit, 2001)
United States v. Caldwell
448 F.3d 287 (Fifth Circuit, 2006)
United States v. Anderson
559 F.3d 348 (Fifth Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
394 F. App'x 58, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rolando-rodriguez-ca5-2010.