United States v. Roland Able Gomes

36 F.3d 1094, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34009, 1994 WL 542828
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 5, 1994
Docket93-6079
StatusUnpublished

This text of 36 F.3d 1094 (United States v. Roland Able Gomes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Roland Able Gomes, 36 F.3d 1094, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34009, 1994 WL 542828 (4th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

36 F.3d 1094

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,
v.
Roland Able GOMES, Defendant Appellant.

No. 93-6079.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Sept. 13, 1993.
Decided: Oct. 5, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-88-38-1-ST, CA-91-104-5-P)

Roland Able Gomes, appellant pro se. Harry Thomas Church, Asst. U.S. Atty., Charlotte, NC, for appellee.

W.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Roland Able Gomes appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court and deny Gomes's motion to remand. United States v. Gomes, Nos. CR-88-38-1-ST, CA-91-104-5-P (W.D.N.C. Jan. 7, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Roger Trenton Davis
36 F.3d 1094 (Fourth Circuit, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 F.3d 1094, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34009, 1994 WL 542828, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-roland-able-gomes-ca4-1994.