United States v. Rojas-Ureste
This text of United States v. Rojas-Ureste (United States v. Rojas-Ureste) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS March 3, 2004 FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 02-40905 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JUANITA ROJAS-URESTE,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (L-01-CR-1203-ALL)
Before BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Pursuant to this court’s 20 May 2003 order, (1) a transcript
of the rearraignment proceeding having been obtained and (2)
Juanita Rojas-Ureste’s pro se request for substitution of counsel
having been denied, counsel appointed to represent Rojas-Ureste has
renewed his request for leave to withdraw and has filed an amended
brief. Rojas-Ureste has not responded. This satisfies the
procedures mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. -2-
Our independent review of the brief and record discloses no
nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Rojas-Ureste, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rojas-ureste-ca5-2004.