United States v. Rojas-Martinez
This text of 225 F. App'x 252 (United States v. Rojas-Martinez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Francisco Rojas-Martinez pleaded guilty to illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 and was sentenced to 50 months of imprisonment *253 and three years of supervised release. Rojas-Martinez argues that the district court abused its discretion by refusing to extend the time for filing his notice of appeal. Having been given no reason at all for the delay, the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Rojas-Martinez’s motion. United States v. Clark, 51 F.3d 42, 43 n. 5 (5th Cir.1995). The district court’s denial of his motion for extension of time to appeal is AFFIRMED. See United States v. Leijano-Cruz, 473 F.3d 571, 573 (5th Cir.2006).
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
225 F. App'x 252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rojas-martinez-ca5-2007.