United States v. Rojas
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-40746 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus
ROLAND ROJAS,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-99-CR-1122 -------------------- April 12, 2001
Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Roland Rojas has moved for leave
to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Rojas has received a copy of
counsel’s motion and brief, but he has not filed a pro se brief
of his own. Our review of the brief filed by counsel and of the
record discloses no nonfrivolous point for appeal. Accordingly,
the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 00-30485 -2-
Although Rojas did not file a response brief, he has filed a
motion for appointment of counsel. That motion is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Rojas (United States v. Rojas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.