United States v. Rogers

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Rogers. Read the opinion of the Court — 126 F.3d 655
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 16, 1999·No. 98-31412·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-31412 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RICKEY JEROME ROGERS,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 98-CR-99-ALL --------------------

December 15, 1999

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Counsel appointed pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act to

represent Rickey Jerome Rogers has moved to withdraw and has

filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967). Rogers has not filed a response. Our independent review

of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for

appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,

and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Rogers, (5th Cir. 1999).

United States v. Rogers (United States v. Rogers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)