United States v. Rogers

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6386

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RUTHERFORD RONALD ROGERS, a/k/a Ronald Lee Saname, a/k/a Ronald Jackson, a/k/a Rodney Walker, a/k/a Theodore Ronald Willis, a/k/a Sylvester Ronald Lewis, a/k/a John Mendenhall, Jr.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frank A. Kaufman, Senior District Judge. (CR-88-70-K, CA-95-1133-K)

Submitted: November 21, 1996 Decided: December 3, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rutherford Ronald Rogers, Appellant Pro Se. Philip S. Jackson, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiter- rorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-

132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Rogers, Nos. CR-88-70-K; CA-95-1133-K (D. Md. Feb. 29, 1996). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED